SAS Hero Abandoned By The British Government.

In the United Kingdom, we are fortunate to have the best Special Forces Regiment in the world; The Special Air Service, otherwise known as the SAS or simply The Regiment. Only a few select few from all over the British Army make it into their ranks and once their secrecy is the number one priority. The reason I call them the best in the world is really quite simple, all other special forces groups from around the world either call upon them to help train their instructors or model their training on the SAS. Groups such as Delta Force the American equivalent, GSG9 the German Anti Terrorist Unit, Mossad the Israeli special forces, the Australian SAS and many others. However I am not here to give you a history lesson on the finest fighting force the world has ever witnessed, I am writing about an SAS hero abandoned by the British Government.

  

SAS Hero Danny Nightingale

SAS Hero, Danny Nightingale, aged 37, married with two young children, also served a total of 17 years in the British Army, 11 of which where with The Regiment, has recently returned from Iraq and on doing so has been locked up in an English prison for 18 months. So lets think for what terrible crime would our British Government lock away such a hero, who fought to ensure those very same politicians can sit safely in their rich surroundings sipping expensive whiskey. Was it Rape? No. Was it Murder? No, Was it pedophilia? Absolutely not. Perhaps was it burglary? No. So what on earth could this hero have done to warrant such a hefty sentence after all he has done for his country, all he has sacrificed. Well let me explain.

During his tour in Iraq, one of his duties was to help train new recruits into the Iraqi Army, one of the cornerstone reasons we are feed as to the reason our soldiers are still in this war, to help ensure better trained Iraqi Police and Army. On completion of this duty, he was presented with a pistol from his very grateful students, it is customary that when other Armies cross paths or other regiments cross paths, even if it is a football game, they present each other with something from their own regiment. Obviously these young Iraqi men only had the pistol and presented it to him. So on returning to England he was arrested by police and this was his crime. Sgt Danny Nightingale did not brandish the weapon at anyone, in fact by the time Sgt Nightingale had returned home, he had completely forgotten about the weapon as it was still left in his bags packed away.

Release The Innocent Victim.

Sgt Danny Nightingale's poor wife has been tirelessly writing letters to the Prime Minister to get involved and help have Sgt Nightingale released. Obviously he should never have been in this position in the first place, however the hope now is that Sgt Nightingale can be home safely with his wife and two children for Christmas.

Despite Mrs Nightingales constant writing to No. 10 Downing Street, the backing of every soldier in the British Army, the backing of the SEAL Team who killed Bin Laden and the British people, Mr Cameron is still not getting involved and so by association agrees with the system that has jailed our SAS hero.

The Broken British Judicial System

So lets take a quick look at our disgusting judicial system, this system that is supposed to protect us from murders, from the terrible crime of rape, pedophiles and many other criminal offences. So here are a few examples of our British Judges at their finest, I have also provided links to the full stories on these Judges should you wish to know more about them.

I will start with one of my most mildest of examples, however one of the most recent. On the 7th of September, Judge Peter Bowers was paraded all over the press after not only letting a burglar off a two and half year sentence, he then followed his disgusting decision by commenting at Teesside Crown Court: "It takes a huge amount of courage for somebody to burgle somebody's house. I wouldn't have the nerve."

My next example of the amazing British Justice system concerns Judge Gareth Hawkesworth, unfortunately this is polar opposite of the above example and is perhaps one of the most terrible examples of British Justice. Brought before Judge Hawkesworth was a 59 year old monster, who from 1974 to 2010, terrorised six young girls aged from five to 13. Judge Hawkesworth in all his infinite wisdom decided to sentence the monster to five and a half years.

Judge Michael Roach is another disgrace to our judicial system. After a man groomed a 12 year old little girl on the internet met her and had sex with her, was completely let off due to Judge Michael Roach ruling it was consensual sex. Only a year or so before this terrible miscarriage of justice the same Judge jailed a Doctor for one year after it was found he indecently assaulted nine of his patients.

So here we have three judge's of the highest order allowing convicted dangers to society off scott free or very light sentences and yet an SAS hero that gets longer than an internet sex offender and our Prime Minister sees no miscarriage of justice on any of these cases. We really do live in a messed up society.



It is so important that we make as much noise as possible about this and let the world know about the disgusting treatment of SAS Hero Sgt Danny Nightingale by the very Government who sent him to a war based on lies in the first place. I would also like to mention, that all the way through this article I have been referring to Sgt Danny Nightingale as a Hero and although I know he would hate to be classed as such, I have done so because in the eyes of the British Public, this is exactly how he should be viewed. I served in the 1st Bn Irish Guards for 12 years and was medically retired due to a spinal injury and I have friends who have also served in the SAS, none of which class themselves as hero's, the same of which applies to soldiers throughout the British Army.

Do You Have Faith In The Justice System

British Justice System

For many years, the British Justice System has been the corner stone of law and order throughout the entire world, many countries have embraced our system as their own in a bid for true justice. However in 2012 can we really still say the same thing about our justice system, can you really put all your faith in such a system when it comes to seeking Justice as a victim of crime in any of it's horrible forms. More and more often we read articles in broadsheets and tabloids about High Court Judges passing ridiculously light sentences for some of the most heinous crimes know to man. So my question to you is, do you have faith in the Justice System? however don't answer just yet, read this article and then I would love to read your answers.



I think at one point or another, we have all felt a miscarriage of justice had been served upon us, even in the lightest term of the word, perhaps had a decision at school go against us or maybe even in a court of law. However the types of miscarriages I am referring to here, are ones consciously made by our so called elite, in what one would assume, a most simplest of cases. I would like to point out before I put forward to you my examples, although in the main I am referring to the British Justice system, I would like you all, no matter where you are from to enter into the debate and perhaps leave you own examples.

Judge Peter Bowers:

I will start with one of my most mildest of examples, however one of the most recent. On the 7th of September, Judge Peter Bowers was paraded all over the press after not only letting a burglar off a two and half year sentence, he then followed his disgusting decision by commenting at Teesside Crown Court: "It takes a huge amount of courage for somebody to burgle somebody's house. I wouldn't have the nerve." Not content letting this individual off a pretty deserving two and half year sentence for thinking he had the right to take another persons hard earned belongings, the Judge actually congratulated him for bravery. Men and Women who police this country are brave, Men and Women who risk their lives putting out fires and getting sick and injured people to hospital are brave, Men and Women who go to war for this country are brave, scum bags who take what does not belong to them just cause the can, are not brave. In fairness to the individual on trial, even he said the judge was out of order and that it was not a brave thing to do, as did the young man's family. 

Judge Gareth Hawkesworth:

My next example of the amazing British Justice system concerns Judge Gareth Hawkesworth, unfortunately this is polar opposite of the above example and is perhaps one of the most terrible examples of British Justice. Brought before Judge Hawkesworth was a 59 year old monster, who from 1974 to 2010, terrorised six young girls aged from five to 13. Judge Hawkesworth in all his infinite wisdom decided to sentence the monster to five and a half years, probably only serve half of the time passed. However Judge Hawkesworth has form when it comes to child abusers, not long before this case, he completely let off a 14 year old boy who raped a 4 year old little girl. I fully understand that when a case of this magnitude involves two children in the eyes of the law, that decisions are much harder to make. However, as a father of a 12 year old daughter, she knows the difference between right and wrong and of course she gets things wrong and get's herself in trouble, but never in a million years would she harm another living soul. Not all children are brought up in such moral environments, but in my opinion Judge Hawkesworth is just as dangerous as the criminals who stand before him.

Judge Michael Roach:

Judge Michael Roach is another disgrace to our judicial system. After a man groomed a 12 year old little girl on the internet met her and had sex with her, was completely let off due to Judge Michael Roach ruling it was consensual sex. Only a year or so before this terrible miscarriage of justice the same Judge jailed a Doctor for one year after it was found he indecently assaulted nine of his patients. 

The are so many other cases of similar value to that highlighted above. As members of the public we can sit at our breakfast table reading such filth and feeling outrage and sympathy for the real victims, but in reality there is nothing we can do, but why can we not do anything. 

I would love to know, when we as a nation decided that just because a person was educated in Eton, Cambridge or Oxford; that these people where immune from responsibility or that they were the right and only people to run our country. when the truth of the matter is, many of these so called academics, have been put through systems where intelligence is not always the requirement for success, status and excellence. I can't right what I think happens in places such as the above, however these people, our MP's, Lords and QC are supposed to be the very foundation of leadership, etiquette, honour etc, however the truth is so far from this it is unreal. 

MP Andrew Mitchell:

MP Andrew Mitchell was recently employed by the Prime Minister to become the chief whipping boy, in other words, responsible for discipline within the Conservative Party. On Friday evening whilst leaving a long day at the office from No. 10 Downing Street, our beloved privately educated, and therefore obviously the only man for the job, began to fire abuse towards the Police Officers on guard at No 10's gates. This reason for this rage was simply due to the fact Mr Mitchell was unable to use a certain gate for leaving and was requested to use another. Mr Mitchell was made to apologise by Mr. David Cameron, however Mr. Mitchell is still denying he abused the Police Officers with certain language, despite the fact three separate Officers recorded what was said. Had this of been a civilian, they quite rightly would have been arrest under a Public Order offence, but because it has come from one of the countries elite, that is OK. 

Of course there are some outstanding men and women serving the British Justice System and for them, they must feel as though they are fighting an uphill battle to bring light upon the system that once shone so brightly. 

I know I sound like I am ranting and I apologise for this, however it saddens me that the very people we vote into power to help us do what is right as a nation are every bit as corrupt as the common criminal on the street, only difference is perhaps a Savile Row Suite as opposed to a Hoodie. We are constantly bombarded with lies from Judges and Politicians alike telling us they have the countries best interest's at heart, when in actual fact the only interest they have is their own. I'm not an educated man but I am a man of honour, Compassion dignity and integrity, qualities we see less and less of from our so called elite, our leaders and law makers.  

Should Guns Be Banned

In America, certain States are allowed to bear arms, it is in the American Constitution, it is their constitutional right. Now I am not an American citizen nor do I know much about American law and the very constitution the nation was founded upon, however I feel this is a very universal topic and I would like to get your views and opinions on the matter.

If an intruder, enters your home, in the dead of night, whilst you, your Wife or Husband and children sleep; should you have the right to use whatever force is necessary to protect your family and property? In my opinion, as a husband and father of three young children, and former member of the British Army, if anyone jeopardises my families safety I will do whatever it takes to prevent that from happening. Should that involve killing a person... then so be it. They way I view this particular situation is, the individual intruding into my home should not be there and they have not been invited.



However, here in the UK, the intruder, nine times out of ten has the law on their side. There have been so many cases in this country where an intruder has been badly damaged whilst in the middle of burglary or trying to hurt another family member and not only has the intruder placed a claim for compensation, but the owner of the property has been charged with GBH, (Grievous Bodily Harm). Many individuals have called for a reform in our laws and some have even asked for the right to bear arms, but no government has stepped up to the plate and even so much as broached the subject never mind change it.

Currently in America, many feel that Barrack OBama and the men stood behind him pulling the strings, have helped orchestrate, terrible atrocities, such as Columbine and more recently the Denver cinema complex massacre, in order to push through legislation that will result in a total gun ban throughout America. States such as Chicago and New York already have gun bans in place and yet the level of gun crime has not receded.

The argument is this, if a gun ban is in place and no individual is by law permitted to own a gun, then the gun crime level will be reduced. However the type of individuals likely to commute a gun crime and not generally law biding citizens and will find a gun regardless. This individual will in turn have an easier time of killing people, knowing that he or she is less likely to meet resistance from a gun wielding citizen. For example, if you where of the mind set to burgle a property, would you do so to a property where you know you will be met by the owner of said property wielding a gun? Or would you go to the house where they have not guns?



So far I am with the group who feel it is their right to have weapons in their property of protection and perhaps legalised sport such as hunting. Before I move onto the next part of this argument I want to make it clear I have served with the British Army for 13 years and as an infantry soldier, am classified as a weapons expert, as all infantry soldiers in the British Army are.

My concern for legalising weapons in any form is this, I fully concur that it is not the gun, that is the dangerous party in all of this, it is the person using the weapon. But if an individual who owns a rifle rack in his home with all the legal protocol in place suddenly has a break down, from whatever pressures  and becomes severely mentally unstable, decides to lift a gun and either kill their family, or kill ordinary citizens in the street, what is the answer in this case. Or what happens if you have children in your house and they happen to get hold of a gun and an accident occurs, what happens in this situation. In both situations, I fully understand that other items can be used to devastating effect, but nothing in the domestic home can ever be as devastating or irreversible as a double barrel shotgun.



Personally I am split beyond belief on this matter. I am right behind any man or women who protects their home and family from the intruders of this world who feel they have a God given right to take whatever they want. To shoot someone in this manner, I have no sympathy for them whatsoever and would not lose a single nights sleep over doing it myself. However I keep coming back to the high risk and probability of mistakes being made with such a powerful weapon.

I would really love to hear from you if you have an opinion on this matter, perhaps you can sway me one way or the other, educate me one way or the other. I must stress that I am not saying one group or the other are wrong. I personally think it is a very serious debate and one that needs all involved to voice opinions and develop a solution.

Denver Airport The Truth

Denver Airport in Colorado Springs has been the topic of debate among Truth Seekers and Conspiracy Theorist’s alike since the erection of the new Airport. Although Truth Seekers and Conspiracy Theorist’s don’t normally like to be referred to in the same sentence, on this matter they are fairly untied in opinions.   

The airport I am referring to in this article is Denver Airport, which was built in 1995, despite the fact Denver already had a fully functioning airport called Stapleton International Airport. This is one of many interesting facts which has initially attracted groups such as the fore mentioned. Ordinarily when a new construction is built to replace another, it is either due to the fact the previous structure is faulty or that the new proposed structure needs better technology or in the case of an airport, more runway space. None of this was in fact the case with Denver Airport. Stapleton was fully operational with no underlaying issues and the replacement airport had less runway space nor did it sport an fantastic new technological advancements over the previous. However having said all that, the new Denver Airport did have an enormous amount of dead space surrounding the Airport which is owned by the Airport and has no plans in place for extra runways or parking etc. One final aspect to the actual construction of Denver Airport, from an arial perspective or satellite image, the entire complex forms the shape of a giant Nazi Swastika, which understandably does not sit too comfortable with some people.

Perhaps the single most talked about feature of the new Denver Airport, and this is only due to it’s blatant visibility as there are many other disturbing features; is the collection of protected murals. 

In plan site of passengers departing and entering the airport, there are approximately four giant sized wall murals depicting horrifying images. Many people have expressed the fact that airports for the vast majority of people, are intimidating places at the best of times, to be bombarded with such explicit images of death before boarding an airplane is boarder line sadistic. Are these murals one mans warped artistic mind running wild, or are they a visual representation of plans laid out by the NWO (New World Order) who many people feel are the true architectures of Denver Airport. As you can see from the images, there are many interpretations one can see within the murals. The image of what looks to be a Russian Stormtrooper wielding an Arabian Sword in one hand as it slices through the Earth leaving devastation and destruction in it’s path and an AK-47 in the other hand. It is worth noting about this particular image, the sword appears to be slicing through two tower blocks, pretty reminiscent of the Twin Towers disaster in 9/11. Whats more frightening about this image is that it was painted well before the 9/11 tragedy. The artist responsible for the murals is Leo Tanguma, who to the best of my knowledge has never actually held an interview explaining the meaning of the murals, if in fact there are meanings. 

As I have already briefly mentioned the New World Order and their involvement behind the Airport, let me just explain a little bit about this group. Many people believe and with good reason, that an elite group of individuals run the world and we are not alluding to simple straight forward individuals such as President’s, Prime Minister’s and Monarchy’s but much more influential destructive people than these. The individuals who really pick and chose governments throughout the globe, people who hold much more power and fare grater evil minds than the lunatics we openly call our leaders. It is thought that the New World Order group need to reduce the population on this planet by quite a bit, and by that I mean a reduction of billions, lives that are only seen as parasitic to the globalist mentality and therefore totally expendable. 

On entering Denver Airport you are openly welcomed by a large Cornerstone, which has engraved on it the following message. “New World Airport Commission Contributors”. There is other information on the stone however this particular phrase is of special interest as there is no such organization as “New World Airport Commission Contributors”, and so could this be a metaphor for the New World Order, or perhaps a secret building block in their plan for global domination? 

On further investigation of the airport the periodic table symbol for gold and silver (Au Ag) appears throughout different areas of the airport, however certain individuals think it represents something far more sinister. One of the main sponsors of Denver Airport is also supposed to have discovered a new deadly strain of the Hepatitis B Virus also known as Australia Antigen, which also has the (Au Ag) symbol. Obviously due to this people assume the symbol with the (Au Ag) represents the method on which the New World Order are to reduce the population to the preferred size.

The final piece of the puzzle as far as Denver Airport is concerned is the massive underground network that many local people have watched materialise over the last few years or more. Vast underground buildings and a network of tunnels connecting have been witnessed and when the Airport officials are questioned or even people working on the construction asked about it, they simply reply that they are not permitted to talk about it, or ignore the question altogether. Within this vast network of underground tunnels and buildings made of concrete, sprinkler type systems have been installed, again when people inquire about a sprinkler system installed in a non flammable environment, blank expressions are returned. All of this adds fuel to the theory that when the New World Order kickstart their mission to overthrow the globe, that Denver Airport’s underground networks and others like it around the wold will be used to contain citizens under Martial Law. Once they have been rounded up and herded into these complexes, the so called sprinkler systems will become apparent. Much like the terrible concentration camps of Nazi Germany, these sprinkler systems will pump through the deadly Hepatitis B virus (Au Ag Australia Antigen)

As with all Truth Seeking Theories or Conspiracy Theories of this nature, there is always another group who are more than willing to explain all the demonic type actions I have explained in this article. For example while (Au Ag is partially correct in representing Australia Antigen) after I conducted my own research on this matter, I discovered that it is only partially right and that the correct abbreviation for the strain is (Au Ag-Ab), so one must ask has this been left off to fit someone else’s theory. Also as far as the sprinkler system, regardless of the environment being concrete and pretty much non flammable, in all underground establishments oxygen is constantly pumped and pure oxygen like this can cause massive potential for fire and this could be what the sprinkler system is in place for. 

As for the other things such as the shape of the complex and the terrifying murals, I don’t have an answer as to why they have been situated at an airport in the intimidating fashion they have been sited. It has also been reported on various occasions that high profile individuals such as the British Royal Family and many others in this realm of status, have purchased property close to the facility. It is of course no secret, that not far from Denver Airport, in the Cheyenne Mountains of Colorado Springs, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defence Command) are stationed deep within and under the mountain's. It is quite obvious to the reasoning behind this, NORAD are responsible for maintaining control over Satellite's placed in space by America, NORAD monitor much further than the skies for the possibilities of foreign attack. They are also the last line of defence in terms of command centre should we ever face a Nuclear Holocaust

For me personally, I am always open minded to pretty much everything, I think to shut off and ignore what is going on around us, is to be ignorant and that is neither helpful to me as an individual or to other people around me. However I do try to take a logical approach on matters, I don’t always get things right, but so long as I have researched the matter for myself, then I know I am not simply being lead by the few who want it to be like that. 

I would love to know your thoughts and opinions on this matter and if you have read about this before or simply about the idea of a New World Order in general.          

Babies in the Work Place

This morning on the main national news, topic of conversation was employees bringing their children with them to work, primarily this is due to the cost of child care. Later this evening on UK television, a documentary will look at this new concept on trial in America, here in the UK certain companies already permit this action. I just want to make it clear from the beginning that we are not talking about a childcare facility at the work place, but employees actually sit with the child whilst working. However one aspect of this topic, babies in the work place, that always angers me is the flippant attitude towards those actually caring for children.

Here in the UK, we have some excellent facilities setup to care for children from nought to five and obviously running those establishments are highly professional and dedicated women, in some cases men. One of the main problems parents complain about when the subject of childcare arises is the cost. I am constantly hearing that childcare in the UK is too high. But a question I would like to ask all those in this camp is, "How much is your child worth?"

Many of us when putting household items, or our precious vehicles in storage or in the care of another, will pay whatever it takes to ensure a high quality service is catered for, but when it comes to our children, we are always looking to scrimp.

Individuals who actually look after our children are in fact professionals, people who have spent three years plus, at college studying for a qualification to put themselves in that job. When they eventually do land a job in the childcare sector, it is without doubt one of the worst paid jobs in the country. Child care providers who have been in the business for twenty plus years are earning just over the minimum wage, there is very little scope for career advancement and there is certainly very little appreciation toward these incredibly dedicated individuals. I say dedicated, because these unique individuals have to be 100% dedicated considering the very poor wage structure.

These men and women in the childcare sector, put everything they have into ensuring the welfare of the children whilst in their care, day after day caring for sick children who, despite protocol in position for ill children staying at home, are still brought into the childcare environment as the parent does not want to miss a day at work. Children running temperatures, kids being kids and squabbling, plus all the paperwork that is required by law for the provider to complete on a daily bases.

I personally think that when people complain about the cost of childcare, perhaps they could spare a thought for the people looking after, what should be considered the most precious thing in their lives, their child. Take into consideration the very low pay and the personal dedication that is invested into your child to ensure they are given the very best care and attention at all times.




Don't get me wrong, there are bad eggs within the industry, as there is in every industry, Journalism, Law, Police, Teaching, Medical and many many more professions that have all at one time or another hit the spot light for the wrong reasons. However the disgusting conduct of the few should not be enough to package the entire industry into the same terrible reputation and devalue it.

When we as a society invest large quantities of time and money into luxury items and whatever it takes to insure those items, we also need to put exactly the same energy, if not more into ensuring we get the very best care for our children at whatever cost. As I am sure you have already deduced, I do in fact have a loved one in the profession and I see on a daily basis the time and dedication she invests into her profession and the children she looks after. Spare a thought, is all I ask.